Subtlety is more than attention to detail. Attention to detail is looking beyond the spell-check engine's declaration that 'where' and 'wear' or 'their' and 'there' are all spelled correctly, in spite of the fact only two of them are correct for any given situation. Subtlety is font choice, leading, page size and image tone. In the case of a presentation, subtlety includes slide builds, transitions, text sizing and line length.Follow up:
A client of mine recently hired me to produce a “PowerPoint” for them. Up front, I told them I used Keynote on the Mac, and—as non-Mac-zealot-ly as I could—explained why. I started with a two-way show-and-tell.
I had my client to show me one of their existing presentations. Next, I asked them what they liked and what they disliked about their current presentation. Their list of what make them uncomfortable was visibly longer than their list of likes.

Then I showed them one of my Keynote presentations. Again, I asked them for their likes and dislikes. What made my Keynote presentation visibly richer and inspire greater confidence in the topic, PowerPoint could not accomplish. To produce the visual effects for this one presentation with software available on Windows would have probably cost them more than they spent on a MacBook Pro 13″. This one-time purchase of the proper tool continued to accrue additional cost savings over the next three presentations I built for them.
Think of giving a presentation as rushing into battle. You only have one chance to succeed. Failure in a presentation ensures everyone sitting in front of you may never look at you again. Rushing into battle with anything less than the best tools does not provide as strong of return on investment as having the best tools available. Notice I said nothing about "industry-standard" or "most-compatible". In all honesty, I don't want anyone else in my industry to read this blog... I don't want them to have as strong of presence as I have! For me and my clients, the Mac is a small price for distinction and differentiation.I’ve created quite a number of Keynote presentations for myself and others… and every one of them utilizes elements that PowerPoint simply does not have. If I wanted to be hampered by PowerPoint’s feature-set, I’d use PowerPoint. Keynote’s ability to effectively animate objects–and I’m not talking about standard text animations–places my presentations head and shoulders above what everyone using PowerPoint can do. Most everything I create in Keynote is subtle and refined. Quartz renders text and images gorgeously.
My presentations, like many of my clients’, are on visual topics. The animations and transitions I use do not distract from the verbal portion of the presentation. The effects I utilize are there to reinforce the verbal component. I personally find the blocky transitions, shoddy typography and kitchy animations in PowerPoint to be highly distracting and uncomfortable.
Think back to your first date with someone you really thought was a keeper. You only had one chance to make that good first impression. You pulled out all the stops... fresh change of clothes, washed car, nice restaurant. You entered battle prepared to win.
Presentation. Book. Trade show banner. Website. Small subtleties sometimes make the difference between getting the sale and going home alone.
Comment from: Gary Moriales [Visitor]
Ok, I see what you're saying. I think I'm gonna have to look into this more...
01/18/10 @ 21:12
Comment from: Suzie - entertainment cagayan de oro [Visitor] · http://spookscdo.com/
Ok i see..You have a good presentation I think..The photo there.Is that a railway?
01/22/10 @ 04:25
Comment from: Tom [Member]
The photo is of a boardwalk trail in the forest at Glacier National Park. We stopped there as an aside on a business trip and shot some photographs. It rained the entire day we were in the Park. Getting some of the photos we did ended up being a battle between man and mud.
01/22/10 @ 11:28
Comment from: Julie Serjan [Visitor]
I'm glad that you mentioned this. You would think more peoplel would understand this but it's not that simple I guess.
01/25/10 @ 07:19
Comment from: Mark S [Visitor]
Glad that you shared this! It's some pretty great info, I know some people that will really enjoy this.
01/28/10 @ 05:09
Comment from: Short sale in San Diego [Visitor]
I like the first point you made there, but I am not sure I could pratcially apply that in a postive way.
03/04/10 @ 21:35
Comment from: San Diego short sales [Visitor]
Hey mate, thanks for posting but this page isn't vewable when using Safari it is is overlapping.
03/04/10 @ 21:40
Comment from: Tom [Member]
Thanks for your input regarding Safari. Both Andy and I typically use Firefox as our daily driver, we pop around between the browsers as needed... and something can always break when viewed in one and not the other. I looked at the page in Safari 4 on OS X 10.6.2 and everything looks fine on my end.
Please let me know what is overlapping and what version of Safari you're using (Mac or Windows, version, OS version, etc.) Thanks for stopping by and commenting. Feedback (especially of broken things) is the refiner's fire that moves us ever closer to perfection.
Please let me know what is overlapping and what version of Safari you're using (Mac or Windows, version, OS version, etc.) Thanks for stopping by and commenting. Feedback (especially of broken things) is the refiner's fire that moves us ever closer to perfection.
03/04/10 @ 21:55
Comment from: Wilmington [Visitor]
Hey I was just viewing your post on my Google Phone and I was wondering how well it will work on the new ipad thats coming out. Fleeting thought.... Anyway thanks!
03/06/10 @ 11:21
Comment from: Tom [Member]
At this point all I have regarding anything iPad are assumptions. But as soon as I know for sure, I'll let you know.
The site renders fine in Mac Safari so I would guess it will render fine on the iPad.
The site renders fine in Mac Safari so I would guess it will render fine on the iPad.
03/06/10 @ 21:28
Comment from: Demarcus Majorga [Visitor] · http://bit.ly/info/bJQNJh
Dein Beitrag hat mir sehr weitergeholfen, danke.
03/18/10 @ 09:36
Comment from: citibank internet banking [Visitor]
@chels I know what you mean, its hard to find good help these days. People now days just don't have the work ethic they used to have. I mean consider whoever wrote this post, they must have been working hard to write that good and it took a good bit of their time I am sure. I work with people who couldn't write like this if they tried, and getting them to try is hard enough as it is.
03/31/10 @ 06:07
Comment from: pudzianowski vs silvia [Visitor]
Excellent article i am sure that i will come back here soon
04/06/10 @ 16:39
Comment from: ufc odds [Visitor]
I see a lot of good articles here, what template do you use, is this random template ?
04/08/10 @ 03:48
Comment from: Short sale in San Diego [Visitor]
Hey, I think your really on track with this, I can't say I totally agree , but its not really that big of a issue.
04/23/10 @ 00:30
Comment from: how to download from youtube [Visitor]
I came across your blog, i think your blog is interesting, keep us posting.
04/26/10 @ 09:05
Comment from: Jermaine [Visitor]
Great article, you mention some really interesting point. You can see oter opinions on the matter.
04/30/10 @ 07:21
Comment from: randki [Visitor]
Is this cms you use good for my first blog ? I want to start blogging soon and looking for good platform.
05/04/10 @ 10:54
Comment from: driver indir [Visitor]
I read this post via the twitter feed. It was interesting to see both sides of the what will be an ongoing story.
05/12/10 @ 08:34
Comment from: Bank Online [Visitor]
Hey mate, thanks for sharing but this page isn't vewable in Firefox it is doubled up.
05/13/10 @ 09:21
Comment from: betting football online [Visitor]
Hey mate, greetings from the Netherlands !
05/23/10 @ 16:02
This post has 11 feedbacks awaiting moderation...
12/01/09 10:44:21 am, 